How Top Studios Collaborate on Brand Design (Without Losing the Magic)

Collaborate

Great brand design isn’t a solo sport. It’s a relay, a jam session, a bunch of bright minds pulling in the same direction without stepping on each other’s toes. The best studios in 2025 have something in common: their collaboration isn’t accidental. It’s designed.

I’ve been inspired by how studios like Smith & Diction openly share their process, files, and thinking. Their approach proved something simple and powerful: collaboration isn’t a vibe you hope for. It’s a system you build. What follows is a practical playbook for designers and creative directors who want to collaborate deeply without losing the magic that makes brands feel alive.

1. Evolve the Process, Don’t Worship It

Have a documented process you can hand to clients so they know what the journey feels like. Then treat it as a living system. Processes should guide, not cage, the work.

A small shift can change everything. Moving reference folders into a shared moodboard wall lets the whole team “see the brand” earlier: patterns, typography tests, color families, visual metaphors. That shared context strengthens decisions down the road.

Try this:

• Create a one-page Studio Process Overview for clients.

• Maintain an internal “living” version for your team that you revise as you learn.

2. Make the Mess Visible (Early and Safely)

Great work often looks chaotic before it looks clean. Invite the team into that stage.

Set expectations up front: what’s open for collaboration and what’s private until it’s ready. Then host a weekly Zoom-Out Review where you scan the entire file together for 30 minutes. The goal isn’t polish—it’s shared understanding.

Rituals that help:

• Shared moodboard canvases for references, not just final selections

• A labeled area for “wild ideas” so exploration feels welcome

• Clear tags: Exploration, Refinement, Client-Ready

3. Decentralize Taste with Anonymous Voting and Comments

If you want honest participation from juniors and new voices, lower the stakes and protect the people. The fastest way to do that is anonymous voting paired with comments.

Use a simple Green/Red system during early rounds:

• Green dot anything that sparks excitement

• Red dot items that feel off-brief or weak

• Add a short anonymous comment for why you voted: “feels too corporate,” “unexpected warmth,” “great letter rhythm,” “poor small-size read”

This does three things:

1. It invites everyone to contribute without hierarchy bias.

2. It surfaces outliers worth discussing—often where the most original ideas live.

3. It trains the team’s shared vocabulary: what “strong,” “legible,” or “ownable” really mean for this brand.

Prompt the conversation with questions like:

• What emotion does this mark evoke at first glance?

• Where might this direction fail in the real world?

• What story does this variant tell better than the others?

4. Don’t Lock It In Too Early

Efficiency is powerful, but if you optimize too soon you flatten the magic. Protect exploration time like a budget line.

Structure it:

• Exploration Sprint: 1–2 days per milestone dedicated to breadth over polish

• Decision Gate: A short checkpoint after exploration with one decider who calls the next step

• Debrief Note: Capture why a direction advanced (or didn’t). Future-you will thank you

“Efficiency kills love” when it cuts off discovery. Give ideas room to surprise you.

5. Component-Driven Branding from Day One

Some logos look electric on a pristine artboard and strangely lifeless on packaging, signage, or a phone screen. That’s why top studios test in context early and build the brand as a system from the very start.

Make the logo, monogram, and wordmark components. Then place them into living mockups:

• Outdoor signage, packaging, shipper boxes

• Social tiles, story frames, thumbnails

• App icons, favicons, browser tabs

• Stationery, receipts, menus, wearables

Advantages:

• You see real-world emotion early: does it still feel bold on a billboard? Premium on a tiny bottle? Friendly on a receipt?

• You stop polishing a mark in isolation and start building a brand that behaves.

• You can refine the symbol behind the scenes and swap once to propagate across your mockups—faster iteration, better judgment.

The goal isn’t a logo that wins in a vacuum. It’s a system that sings everywhere it lives.

6. Roles, Cadence, and Decision Logs

Collaboration needs structure to stay creative.

Lightweight structure:

• Roles (RACI-lite): Lead, Reviewer, Contributor, Approver

• Cadence: Kickoff → Mid-Exploration Review → System Build Check → Client Rehearsal → Final

• Decision Log: One page with decision, rationale, owner, date, and impacted assets

This reduces churn, preserves momentum, and makes onboarding new collaborators painless.

7. Share Bravely, Credit Generously

Sharing process can feel risky. It’s also a magnet for better conversations, better clients, and better hires—when done thoughtfully.

Guidelines:

• Publish a sanitized case file after launch: process snapshots, learnings, and behind-the-scenes logic

• Create an attribution policy so teammates and partners are properly credited

• Establish boundaries: what never leaves the studio (strategy docs, raw research, unreleased marks)

Credit matters. I want to acknowledge Smith & Diction for inspiring this mindset—especially their openness about process, their “green/red” participation ritual, and their component-first, build-in-public sensibility. Their generosity has pushed the field forward.

For Creative Directors: Leading the Room

Great CDs don’t just pick winners—they build the environment where winners emerge.

Try this 3-step cadence:

1. Start reviews with intent: “What are we trying to prove in this round?”

2. Ask three questions before you give an opinion. Curiosity first, judgment second.

3. End with one clear next step and owner. Ambiguity is the silent killer of momentum.

Conclusion: Collaboration Is a Design Choice

Top studios don’t cross their fingers and hope for chemistry. They design for it—evolving their process, making the mess visible, decentralizing taste, protecting exploration, testing in context, and building brands as systems from day one.

Do that consistently and you won’t lose the magic. You’ll make it repeatable.

—
Credit: Some practices and inspiration in this article were informed by the public process ethos and talks from Smith & Diction (Philadelphia), including their approach to open files, flexible process documentation, “red/green” team participation, and building in the open. All interpretations, additions, and opinions are my own.